This week’s buzz features a Bill Nye rap battle with Isaac Newton, BioLogos on Reddit, Massimo Pigliucci schooling another atheist on philosophy, and controversial new UK creationism laws.
Nye vs. Newton Rap Battle
The folks at Epic Rap Battles released a new video featuring Bill Nye and Sir Isaac Newton. (Weird Al plays Newton!) Don’t miss the stellar, pun intended, third scientist who makes a cameo.
BioLogos AMA Tomorrow
The BioLogos Foundation is a Christian think tank that promotes harmony between biblical faith and science. Tomorrow, they’ll have an “Ask Me Anything” on Reddit from 3-5PM ET.
The AMA will happen on Reddit.com/r/Christianity and feature four BioLogos scholars:
New Peter Enns Podcast
Enns appeared on last week’s Newsworthy with Norsworthy podcast. The host, Luke Norsworthy, interviewed Enns about the relationship between the Bible and science. Enns wrote The Evolution of Adam, which is fantastic, and has a new book coming out in September.
10 Misunderstood Scientific Ideas
Have you ever used scientific terms incorrectly? Find out by reading a great article, “10 Scientific Ideas That Scientists Wish You Would Stop Misusing.”
More Massimo, More Problems
The more Massimo talks, the more problems for those who don’t take philosophy seriously, like Sam Harris. Pigliucci says that assuming scientific facts dictate values is “nonsense on stilts.” Pigliucci also explains that facts don’t exist by themselves:
If there is one thing that we learned from philosophy of science during the 20th century, it’s that there is no such thing as a “fact.” All facts, all pieces of information about the world, are actually embedded and they make sense only within a certain theoretical framework. . . .[Facts] become such only once we deploy certain ways of looking at things, and then you have to ask the question, well, where are those ways of looking at things coming from, and now you are already back into philosophy.
If you have the time, it’s worth watching the entire interview.
UK Bans Teaching Creationism as Science
As io9 reported, the UK now prohibits “all public-funded schools — present or future — from teaching creationism as evidence-based theory.”
The UK government’s definition of “creationism” is impressive and nuanced:
“Creationism” . . . is any doctrine or theory which holds that natural biological processes cannot account for the history, diversity, and complexity of life on earth and therefore rejects the scientific theory of evolution. The parties acknowledge that Creationism, in this sense, is rejected by most mainstream Churches and religious traditions, including the major providers of state funded schools such as the [Anglican] [Catholic] Churches, as well as the scientific community.
What would happen if the United States passed similar regulations?