Weekly Buzz: 10/13/14

Dead End?

This week’s buzz features the son of a famous Christian coming out as an agnostic and the results of the world’s largest NDE study—which suggests consciousness is possible after the brain and heart stop working.

“Results of world’s largest Near Death Experiences study published”

A few weeks ago, we looked at a new book about near-death experiences (NDEs). Some interesting news came out about them last week. Resuscitation, a European medical journal, published the results of a study called “AWAreness during Resuscitation” (AWARE).

The University of Southampton (UK) sponsored the study; it began in 2008 and looked at over 2,000 patients in 15 hospitals throughout the US, Austria, and the UK. One fascinating wrinkle is that, for the first time in a big study, they set up “objective markers” to determine if folks having out-of-body experiences near death were hallucinating—or having accurate experiences of their surroundings .

Southampton released a summary of the study’s findings:

• The themes relating to the experience of death appear far broader than what has been understood so far, or what has been described as so called near-death experiences.

• In some cases of cardiac arrest, memories of visual awareness compatible with so called out-of-body experiences may correspond with actual events.

• A higher proportion of people may have vivid death experiences, but do not recall them due to the effects of brain injury or sedative drugs on memory circuits.

• Widely used yet scientifically imprecise terms such as near-death and out-of-body experiences may not be sufficient to describe the actual experience of death. Future studies should focus on cardiac arrest, which is biologically synonymous with death, rather than ill-defined medical states sometimes referred to as ‘near-death’.

• The recalled experience surrounding death merits a genuine investigation without prejudice.

This study is FAR from conclusive, obviously, but it’s awfully interesting. I want to highlight some observations they made about patients who had some kind of awareness during cardiac arrest. Very few of these people accurately saw or heard anything, but some of them DID:

One case was validated and timed using auditory stimuli during cardiac arrest. Dr Parnia concluded: “This is significant, since it has often been assumed that experiences in relation to death are likely hallucinations or illusions, occurring either before the heart stops or after the heart has been successfully restarted, but not an experience corresponding with ‘real’ events when the heart isn’t beating. In this case, consciousness and awareness appeared to occur during a three-minute period when there was no heartbeat. This is paradoxical, since the brain typically ceases functioning within 20-30 seconds of the heart stopping and doesn’t resume again until the heart has been restarted. Furthermore, the detailed recollections of visual awareness in this case were consistent with verified events.

“Thus, while it was not possible to absolutely prove the reality or meaning of patients’ experiences and claims of awareness, (due to the very low incidence (2 per cent) of explicit recall of visual awareness or so called OBE’s), it was impossible to disclaim them either and more work is needed in this area. Clearly, the recalled experience surrounding death now merits further genuine investigation without prejudice.”

You can read the full Resuscitation article here. What do you think of these results?

Stay tuned to Jesus & Dawkins for more on this topic. I interviewed Howard Storm recently about his life-changing NDE. Before his experience, he was an atheist art professor. After his experience, he became a Christian, attended seminary, and started preaching.

“Are Faith and Science Compatible?”

The BioLogos Foundation had a conference in NYC recently with theologians, scientists, pastors, and other leaders. (According to their website, BioLogos “invites the church and the world to see the harmony between science and biblical faith as we present an evolutionary understanding of God’s creation.)

Amy Julia Becker attended the event, and she wrote about it for Christianity Today:

For me, the experience resulted not so much in affirming my views on science, but rather in reminding me of the ways in which, as the Psalmist writes, “the heavens declare the glory of God” (Psalm 19:1).

Her short piece is a great reflection on wrestling with modern science and Christianity.

“Jennifer Wiseman on science and faith”

Speaking of BioLogos, a member of their board of directors, astronomer Jennifer Wiseman, sat down with Sarah Pulliam Bailey and Jonathan Merritt last week. Dr. Wiseman spoke with Sarah and Jonathan about faith and science.

“Tony Campolo’s surprise reaction when his son came out as a humanist”

And speaking of Jonathan Merritt, he wrote a great article about Tony Campolo and his son, Bart. Merritt writes that Bart came out as an agnostic humanist to his father, the famous Christian speaker and writer:

Bart Campolo decided he was no longer a Christian after being injured in a bike accident in 2011. But he waited until last Thanksgiving to break the news to his father, Tony, an influential evangelical leader and author who is famous for having been a spiritual adviser to former President Bill Clinton.

Tony described the news from Bart as “upsetting” and “traumatic,” but their love for each other hasn’t changed. In fact, Bart and Tony are writing a book about their spiritual differences:

The two remain close despite their theological differences and speak on the phone regularly. They are even co-authoring a book together that Tony says is tentatively titled, “A Painful Dialogue Between an Evangelical Father and His Agnostic Son.”

I found Bart’s closing comments very interesting, by the way:

“One thing I learned from Jesus was that if you want to gain your life, you have to lose it for the sake of the gospel,” Bart said. “I may have a different gospel now, but I want to give my life to it. I still have good news to share.”

The whole article is worth reading. What do you make of this news, and are you excited to read their new book?

“Can Wanting to Believe Make Us Believers?”

In The New York Times, Notre Dame philosopher Gary Gutting interviewed Princeton philosopher Daniel Garber. You can count on Gutting for good interviews about theology and philosophy.

My favorite part of the interview was when Garber talked about why he can’t believe in God, even if part of him may want to:

I can’t believe because I’m not convinced that it is true that God exists. It is as simple as that. Belief is not voluntary, and there are no (rational) considerations that move me to believe that God exists. In all honesty, I will admit that I don’t have a definitive argument that God doesn’t exist either. Which is to say that I refuse to make the judgment that some make that it is positively irrational to believe in God in an objective sense. But without convincing affirmative reasons to believe, I’m stuck. If others find reasons that convince them, I’m willing to discuss them and consider them. Who knows? There might be a convincing argument out there, or at least one that convinces me.

On the other hand, it is easy say why I might want to believe. I see people around me — often very smart and thoughtful people — who get great comfort from believing that God exists. Why wouldn’t I want to be like them? It’s just that I can’t.

As always, the entire interview with Gutting is good reading.

What do you think of this week’s buzz?

 

25 thoughts on “Weekly Buzz: 10/13/14

    • That book does sound like an awesome read, right? Hopefully it encourages better Christian dialogue with agnostics/atheists. Hopefully more of these conversations grow organically out of the fertile soil of deep friendships/relationships.

      Like

  1. And that Garber interview looks VERY interesting. Especially the role of desire in belief and faith practice. What are the ethics behind believing something simply because it sounds desirable. I get that this does not work for most things in life, but part of me feels like it might be just fine for more metaphysical claims and beliefs.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Great thoughts about believing in something just because it sounds rad. Can you explain what you mean by “part of me feels like it might be just fine for more metaphysical claims and beliefs”?

      Like

  2. Thanks for this, Mike! Lot’s of interesting links culled together from the interwebs. I always like to come here to see what the “buzz” is and then follow the links to get deeper into the issues.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. The book from Tony and his son Bart sounds fascinating, as someone who is a believer with a father figure who is not. I wonder how Bart is able to acknowledge lessons learned from Christ on the one hand and on the other complete reject him for who he is.

    Liked by 1 person

  4. Garber’s quote, “I can’t believe because I’m not convinced that it is true that God exists” really leaves me wanting to know more. I wonder if after thoughtful consideration Garber would be able to state in the affirmative that he has never held any believe in which he was not convinced that it was true at first? If Garber would answer in the negative, then I would want to further push for why he considers belief in God to warrant different consideration (especially given his admitted desire to get “great comfort from believing that God exists”)?

    Liked by 1 person

  5. It’s funny that some people get tremendous comfort from believing in god while others get the same from not believing in god obviously because of who they believe god to be. But who wouldn’t take tremendous comfort from not believing in a god who apparently hates you.

    Liked by 1 person

  6. Pingback: Howard Storm NDE Interview: Part 1 | Jesus & Dawkins

  7. Saying that believing in God or believing that God doesn’t exist are the two alternatives naturally assumes that we are already in a world where belief was the overwhelming majority. With any other claim, we don’t believe in its opposite. I don’t have to make an effort to justify my belief that Harry Potter isn’t real. He was never offered convincingly as real in the first place. Therefore, it is by definition rational to assume God doesn’t exist until there exists rational evidence otherwise.

    Liked by 1 person

  8. Loved it Mike! The pursuit of truth is and always will be a daunting task. I hope God reveals Himself to all of us the way He did to all those in the Bible.

    Peace.

    Liked by 1 person

  9. Julia Becker’s article was really interesting Mike, thanks for sharing! Definitely my favorite of this weekly buzz. I really resonate with her thoughts, as a believer who often tries to understand how science and faith are compatible. I especially loved when she said: “For me, the experience resulted not so much in affirming my views on science, but rather in reminding me of the ways in which, as the Psalmist writes, “the heavens declare the glory of God” (Psalm 19:1).”

    My sentiments exactly.

    In fact, I was just reading today about Lord Kelvin “The Father of Thermodynamics,” who had this to say: “Science positively affirms Creative Power. It is not in dead matter that we live and move and have our being [Acts 17:28], but in the creating and directing Power which science compels us to accept as an article of belief…. Forty years ago I asked Liebig[one of his friends], walking somewhere in the country if he believed that the grass and flowers that we saw around us grew by mere chemical forces. He answered, “No, no more than I could believe that a book of botany describing them could grow by mere chemical forces”…. Do not be afraid of being free thinkers! If you think strongly enough you will be forced by science to the belief in God, which is the foundation of all religion. You will find science not antagonistic but helpful to religion.”

    Liked by 1 person

  10. Pingback: Weekly Buzz: 1/26/15 | Jesus & Dawkins

Leave a Civil Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s